SandpiperSandpiperSandpiperSandpiper
  • Expertise
  • People
  • Careers
  • News & Insights
  • Contact
  • Events
Public Affairs Tracker:  Key Takeaways from 20th Party Congress of the Communist Party of China
Public Affairs Tracker: Key Takeaways from 20th Party Congress of the Communist Party of China
COP27 and What It Means for Communicators?
COP27 and What It Means for Communicators?

Fashion through the Lens of Sustainability

Categories
  • Consumer Brands
  • Crisis and Issues Communications Management
  • Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
Tags
  • esg communications
Fashion vs Sustainability: The Fast and The Spurious
News & insights

The Fast and The Spurious

– Fashion through the Lens of Sustainability

November 2022
Fashion Sustainability

By Natalia Hau, a senior account manager based in Sandpiper’ office in Singapore. Natalia has 9 years’ experience in providing strategic communications and technical counsel for clients in agriculture, FMCG, retail, renewable energy and sustainability. She is a certified ISCC and SA800 auditor.


For decades, fast fashion companies faced little scrutiny around their sustainability credentials and practices – particularly around those that existed in their supply chains.

But times have changed.

The furore over recent greenwashing allegations against H&M, the multinational clothing company, has cast a significant pallor over the fast fashion industry as well as the challenges that tagged along the trend of conscious consumption. 

News of H&M’s egregious marketing statements first came to light after the findings of a Quartz report were published, highlighting its misleading Higg Index scores for its clothing. More than 100 of the 600 women’s clothing scorecards on its UK site consisted of errors that falsely advertised clothing to be more sustainable than they were.

The groundswell pressure to hold the retail behemoth and others of its ilk accountable, succeeded. In 2021, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) launched an investigation into H&M as well as other retail brands like Decathlon. It reported that the retailers were loosely using eco-centric vernacular such as “Conscious Collection “, bereft of evidentiary support.

ACM concluded that the two brands in question have committed to improving on their customer-facing communications, on top of six-figure donations to chosen sustainable causes as compensation for their erroneous claims. Only time will tell if such remediation is severe enough to galvanize genuine organizational changes from within.

While the dust settles around this PR maelstrom, we should take this opportunity to look at the conditions that have enabled fashion players to slide down, perhaps inadevertently, the slippery slope of spurious greenwashing.

Why do fashion brands greenwash?

The increasing pivot to sustainability in recent years, fuelled by consumer and investor demand, has placed companies under great duress to educate, upskill people and overhaul practices within a short amount of time, to meet lofty SDGs and emissions targets.

The fast fashion industry feels that pressure acutely. Highly resource intensive, the sector also accounts for 10% of global carbon emissions, with around 85% of finished textile goods meeting their demise in landfills year.

For quite some time, fashion companies have been nesting in the comfortable complacency that consumers are indoctrinated to buy anything that is packaged and marketed well. Campaigns often revolve around aesthetics, unique product attributes, celebrity endorsements, promotional pricing etc. The distance between manufacturers and brand in a customer-facing industry results in an emotional dissonance that breeds ignorance, or worse, indifference.

As a result, enabled by the apathy of their customers, the industry perhaps viewed sustainability as a product feature to peddle to the masses, than a natural extension of genuine organisational changes. To make things murkier, words like “eco-friendly” and “green” have loose, varied definitions, potentially confusing consumers that are not well-versed in sustainability lexicon.

As the H&M example has taught us, engaging in marketing legerdemain is a short-term band-aid that ironically would incur far-reaching consequences on a company’s reputation, customer loyalty and bottom line.

Greenwashing by way of unsupported claims, omitting information or leaving out parts of the supply chain, may initially seem like a cost-effective, time-expedient way to win customers. Furthermore, given the trend-driven nature of the industry, this can be seen as an opportunity to improve brand equity and sales.

But as the H&M example has taught us, engaging in marketing legerdemain is a short-term band-aid that ironically would incur far-reaching consequences on a company’s reputation, customer loyalty and bottom line.

Come clean, then green. Don’t greenwash.

Sustainable fast fashion is an oxymoron that should not exist. The “cheap but expensive” paradox plaguing fashion brands makes it challenging to optimise supply chains without changing cost structures, given that the main value proposition is affordability.

In a 2021 report by Changing Markets Foundation, approximately 60% of sustainability claims declared by 12 global fashion brands were found to be ambiguous or unsubstantiated.

Consumers themselves are also increasingly willing to go to investigate and verify claims of products and brands. Those caught in a lie are now more likely to be social media fodder, subject to scorn and ridicule, and plenty examples of this now exist.

What then, can these brands do to restore credibility and trust, during this critical yet inchoate period of ESG disclosures, compliance measures and supply chain responsibility in the fashion world?

×

    Please tell us a bit more about you and your company

    You can unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information on how we are committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Policy

    Click to Download

      Please tell us a bit more about you and your company

      You can unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information on how we are committed to protecting and respecting your privacy, please review our Privacy Policy

      • Explain, not exaggerate. It is time for fashion brands to do away with aspirational labels and catchy slogans that do not carry any weight. Sustainability claims should be written in accessible, factual language and backed with verifiable data and figures. Supply chain information can be technical and confusing, with the involvement of multiple stakeholders. They should be publicly available on websites, digital channels, and sustainability reports. Industry jargon requires some finesse to be easily understood by an average consumer, so put in the work to rejig and refine the messaging till it comes across genuine and honest. Consumers are savvy enough to look beneath the surface, and reference checks can be easily done with technology. Third-party websites like Good On You rates fashion brands and their degree of sustainability in an objective, transparent manner to educate the masses.
      • Certify your certifications. Wading through the plethora of industry certifications in the fashion world can be intimidating – each with its own benchmarks, indices, and metrics. While most seem comprehensive and impressive at first glance, not all can be easily understood or interpreted accurately. Case in point, H&M claimed that it misinterpreted its Higg MSI findings, calling into question the clarity and transparency of the both the Index and Tool that were crafted to improve supplier transparency at the design and product levels. This was followed by a pause of the Higg Index by the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC) after H&M’s warning from the Norwegian Consumer Authority. It is important to engage your chosen certification partners to facilitate a deeper understanding of the frameworks involved and ensure that your company’s sustainability practitioners are properly trained and conversant with the interpretation of the results.
      • Prioritise progress. Instead of simply setting a bold vision, organisations should focus on communicating consistent effort-driven improvements. There is little tolerance from the greenwashing-weary public for empty promises and declarations, particularly those that do not include time-bound, practical, and concrete steps toward achieving them. Sustainability-led communications should showcase progress, development, and milestones in a way that is easily understood by everyone.
      • Seek internal evaluation. Employees can serve as a valuable sounding board. They are familiar enough with your company’s operations and have a vested interest in providing constructive advice to your organisation that reflects their personal values. Seeking internal feedback on sustainability reporting content or key initiatives can be collated through townhalls or surveys, allowing management to allocate resources and time to the ones that are important enough to external and internal stakeholders. The emotional buy-in and motivation from your employees can make all the difference in achieving sustainability-linked goals and targets.

      Every PR crisis brings about a lesson that we all can learn from. In the realm of fast fashion, where trends are short-lived and preferences are fickle, communicating with humility and transparency will always be in season.


      Related news & insights

      ESG Stragety: Moving up the curve
      IPCC Report
      Building reputation capital


      Share

      BEIJING
      Suite 1105, Full Tower,
      No. 9 Middle East 3rd Ring Road,
      Chaoyang District, Beijing, PRC

      北京市朝阳区东三环中路9号
      富尔大厦1105室

      + 86 10 8591 0056
      beijing@sandpipercomms.com

      HONG KONG
      21/F, The Workst@tion,
      43 Lyndhurst Terrace, Central,
      Hong Kong

      香港中環擺花街43號
      The Workst@tion 21樓

      +852 3114 6339
      hongkong@sandpipercomms.com

      NEW ZEALAND
      The Hive 2/200,
      Market Street North, Hawkes Bay,
      New Zealand

      +64 21084 40939
      newzealand@sandpipercomms.com

      SHANGHAI
      No 1229 Century Avenue, 6/F, Tower 1.
      Century Metropolis.
      Pudong New District. Shanghai. 200122

      世纪大道1229号, 世纪大都会6层,
      浦东新区, 上海市, 上海市, 200122

      +86 15507577095
      shanghai@sandpipercomms.com

      SINGAPORE
      #21-02, Prudential Tower, 30 Cecil Street,
      Raffles Place, Singapore, 049712

      +65 6592 2883
      singapore@sandpipercomms.com

      SYDNEY
      Gateway Tower,
      36/1 Macquarie Place, Sydney
      NSW 2000, Australia

      +612 9098 4321
      sydney@sandpipercomms.com

      OUR AFFILIATE NETWORK
      Bangkok
      Berlin
      Brusels
      Dubai
      Frankfurt
      Hanoi
      Ho Chi Minh City
      Jakarta
      Kuala Lumpur
      London
      Manila
      Mumbai
      New York
      Paris
      San Francisco
      Seoul
      Taipei
      Tokyo
      Yangon
      Zurich
      logo

      OUR AFFILIATE NETWORK
      Bangkok Berlin Brussels Dubai Frankfurt Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Jakarta Kuala Lumpur London  
      Manila Mumbai New York Paris San Francisco Seoul Taipei Tokyo Yangon Zurich

      Copyright © Sandpiper Terms of Use Privacy Policy